| Question 1 |
| boston phx |
| port and prov |
| fnxradio |
| stuff@night |
| question 2 |
| PDFs! |
| centralize |
| fnx's /movies |
| no images! |
| same sites |
| question 3 |
| isi.org1 |
| isi.org2 |
| isi.org3 |
| question 4 |
| RSS et al |
| question 5 |
| usability testing |
| site design |
| web resources |
| question 6 |
| donations |
| idanne.com |
| question 7 |
| video |
| rich media |
| communities |
home
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
Question 6
Question 7
GOOD !
(1) Good use of subsections
(2) Making the cover and contents by issue available
(3) Google ads match color scheme of site(s)
(4) Like the little pictures next to the section/article title and...
(5) Like that you can go to the MUSIC section or the article itself
(6) Information available is exhaustive and up to date
1 2
(7) Good writing and editing on interesting topics
(8) Good attempt at not practicing in-your-face advertising
(9) Good use of high quality images. (Use more!)
(10a) PortlandPhoenix.com: The way the contents are described in the What's New section
(10b) ProvidencePhoenix.com: Like the image metaphors used.
